Correspondence from Cains (Advocate for PWC) 08/05/09 to Edwin Coe

Correspondence from Cains (Advocate for PWC) 08/05/09 to Edwin Coe

Dear Mr Greene

We refer to your email addressed to Mike Simpson which refers to your
discussions yesterday and raises two points which you state are worth
repeating. Mr Simpson has asked us to respond, which we do below using
your numbering:-

  1. Your comments in relation to the potential effect of the Scheme of
    Arrangement and the need to preserve any claim under the parental guarantee
    are noted. We have been instructed to give the matter further
    consideration in conjunction with our Client's Icelandic adviser. We will
    revert to you on this point shortly. Our client has however commented that
    it is important to bear in mind the probably commercial value of the

  2. Your recollection that it was agreed that interest after 9th October
    will be included in the value of the claim for voting purposes is not
    correct. Mr Simpson did not agree this. The correct position is clearly
    set out in paragraph 12.5 of the Explanatory Statement.


Yours sincerely



Please note that the content of this site is no longer regularly updated, and much of it may be outdated.

See this page for alternative sites.

Main Menu